Tokar

I dont understand why users have to revert to bashing the software when the original poster asks for help with the software. The original poster was not looking for help uninstall Spyware Terminator, or help finding information about Spyware Terminator or Crawler Toolbar. He simply wanted to know how to enable ClamAV in Spyware Terminator, and furthermore, whether it conflicts with AVG. Why can't anyone answer the simple questions without adding unnecessary information? To enable ClamAV realtime shield, you must first active HIPS from the Advanced tab of the Real-time protection settings tab. Then you must right click the Spyware Terminator system tray icon, and enable HIPS by clicking on "HIPS (Disabled)". It will change to "HIPS (Building Database)". You must wait for it to say "HIPS (Enabled)" before you can enable ClamAV. Once it says "HIPS (Enabled)" you can click on "ClamAV (Disabled)" and enable the shield. ClamAV might conflict with AVG considering both of them are antivirus programs. You may enable both and if you experience performance problems, you can disable ClamAV.

Sigh... Horus: You continue to attack me and the software yet you continue to avoid the simple claims taken directly from the assiste.com.free.fr Craptheque page. I posted them in post #107, and again in #115. Care to respond? You see to have interest in this thread so I patiently await your responses. Im not trying to sell software here. I am here because I was told Assiste.com.free.fr admins are involved with discussions on this forum and my objective is to get the Craptheque page removed. Right now im not asking you to accept or reject the software. I am simply asking you to address the claims made by assiste.com.free.fr, which you are blatantly avoiding.

Talk about a sight for sore eyes. At least someone here is speaking rationally!

I am sorry. Google translate did not help me understand the last two posts. Could you please try your best to use very basic french for Google Translate? Or try to post with your best English possible?

It seems like a few people have a bias seeing as how certain people, who are qualified to answer, are not answering the claims made in Message #115 (taken directly from Assiste.com.free.fr).

Feel free to leave at any time, but you are not helping your cause by avoiding those simple claims made by Assiste.com.free.fr Craptheque page.

double post.

Could you please put your opinions on hold right now?. You are completely avoiding my post. Your opinions are your opinions, I am not going to argue anymore your opinions. It is futile for me to try to convince you of anything since it does not solve the problem I have, which is the Craptheque page. Horus, you have openly admitted to using our software for TWO WEEKS! Again Horus I ask you to address these claims: Claim #1) Crawler offers a lot of free software of the trojan kind. In your testing did you find any trojan? Claim #2) No software is free, there must be revenue somwhere - stealing private info, spyware, adware. In your testing did you find any of these practices? Claim #3) The toolbar BHO is given a negative connotation. Did you find Crawler Toolbar BHO to be as safe as other popular toolbars (Google, Yahoo!, etc.)? Claim #4) The toolbar installs by means of drive-by ActiveX download. Did you find this to be true? Claim #5) Crawler and ST are on the dark side of the net and always have been. Did you find any information pointing you to a "dark" side of the net (which I take to mean Adware, Spyware, Malware, privacy theft, information sale, etc.)? Claim #6) Spyware Terminator is sending information. Did you find Spyware Terminator to be sending any information outside of what is standard for security programs (update information, and community settings similar to Windows Defender, Ad-aware, spysweeper, counterspy,e tc.)? Claim #7) Spyware Terminator removes competitor products. You alluded to the fact that you tested Spyware Terminator on a machine with SSM, SpyBot, and Spyware Blaster. Did Spyware Terminator attempt to remove any of these competing products? Claim # Spyware Terminator removes spyware and adware competitors, thus alluding to a claim that Spyware Terminator itself is spyware/adware. Did you determine Spyware Terminator to be spyware/adware/etc.? Claim #9) All of our software is using Trojans. Did you find any trojans in our software? I kindly ask you to address each claim as you have tested our software. And I would like you to speak based on what you saw while testing. Not what Assiste.com.free.fr saw, or what cyrilcvcf saw, not what cornflower saw. What you saw. Again, you still continue to avoid these issues.

I wanted to post everything in an easy to read layout, in a way which I hope will coax horus to answer. You will see everything is back. I was in the process of editing my post while you were posting . If "magic program" is meant to be the "ultimate program which is our way of saying people should remove everything but Spyware Terminator"... When did I ever suggest this? I am not one of the people going around suggesting people "uninstall" certain safe programs because they are "not good". When did Crawler ever suggest this? No where does Crawler say "avoid software that is not Spyware Terminator". If we find that there is a compatability issue, as we found with Zone Alarm, we will alert the user of a possible incompatability in the install notes, but we won't say REMOVE XXXX IMMEDIATELY like some users here on this forum choose to do. Are you seriously blaming our software for deciding to integrate antivirus, HIPS protection, and domain protection (in the form of Web Security Guard)? This is not a meant to force removal of other software. We are merely improving our software.

Why such the rude remarks? Completely uncalled for. What makes you believe that Spyware Terminator is "bullshit"? Using it on a machine that is using other security software obviously will not prove anything. "Spybot S&D, SpywareBlaster associeted with SSM free or PG full, are really effective" - this seems to be proof that you are using this software in conjunction with Spyware Terminator. You are not providing a proper TEST ENVIRONMENT to prove your claims that ST is "bullshit". Independent outposts which perform real and trustworthy tests of security software and prevention systems (IDS/HIPS) test each security software independently. I use the ST IDS (HIPS) 100% of the day. ST is the only security software that I am using - with ClamAV enabled of course. I have not been infected once, and I visit a lot of bad sites. What is "transparency" supposed to mean? Could you please use a different term? What do you mean by "magic program"? What is that supposed to mean? There are four processes and one driver of Spyware Terminator: SpywareTerminator.exe - this is the main program exe. It will show up when you open ST main window. SpywareTerminatorShield.exe - this is the ring3 realtime shield protection. This will show up only if you have RTS enabled. STServer.exe - this is the plugin for Crawler Toolbar. This will only show up if you have Crawler Toolbar installed with Spyware Terminator added as a plugin. sp_rsser.exe - this is the ring2? ring1? (i have to check which) HIPS protection. This will only show up if you have HIPS enabled. sp_rsdrv2.sys (driver) - this is spyware terminator's ring0 protection. This loads with the kernel. What kind of process configuration do you WANT? It would be helpful if you ELABORATED ON IT and SUGGESTED something instead of COMPLAINING about it. ----------------------------------------------- I am here, I am not going anywhere. I am being completely open about this and all you are trying to do is just push me away and I am not pleased about it. Am I dodging the questions about our company? No, I know they are there, and I will answer them. Because of the difficultly of this situation with the Craptheque page, I am taking this one part at a time. And what I am doing first is trying to find the stem of the problem of the false identifcation of our software as "bad". This is the simplest problem to fix because 1) the claims are completely false, and 2) if people actually installed our software these claims could be debunked in under 10 minutes. You keep dodging these claims and I keep asking you to address them. Your opinion is heavily weighted at Assiste.com.free.fr so it is important that Pierre see them. And since you have now OPENLY ADMITTED to testing our software, I insist you address the following claims in the Craptheque article. My answer is provided in blue, and they are honest responses directly from the company as you know I work for the company. If you disagree please provide proof of why you disagree in the form of screenshots, videos, logs, articles, etc.: (I will take them in the order that I see them) Again I want to point out these are claims taken straight from the Assiste.com.free.fr Craptheque webpage here: http://assiste.com.free.fr/p/craptheque/sp..._termintor.html. Claim #1) Crawler offers a lot of free software of the trojan kind. In your testing did you find any trojan? No Claim #2) No software is free, there must be revenue somwhere - stealing private info, spyware, adware. In your testing did you find any of these practices? No Claim #3) The toolbar BHO is given a negative connotation. Did you find Crawler Toolbar BHO to be as safe as other popular toolbars (Google, Yahoo!, etc.)? Yes Claim #4) The toolbar installs by means of drive-by ActiveX download. Did you find this to be true? No Claim #5) Crawler and ST are on the dark side of the net and always have been. Did you find any information pointing you to a "dark" side of the net (which I take to mean Adware, Spyware, Malware, privacy theft, information sale, etc.)? No Claim #6) Spyware Terminator is sending information. Did you find Spyware Terminator to be sending any information outside of what is standard for security programs (update information, and community settings similar to Windows Defender, Ad-aware, spysweeper, counterspy,e tc.)? No Claim #7) Spyware Terminator removes competitor products. You alluded to the fact that you tested Spyware Terminator on a machine with SSM, SpyBot, and Spyware Blaster. Did Spyware Terminator attempt to remove any of these competing products? No Claim #8) Spyware Terminator removes spyware and adware competitors, thus alluding to a claim that Spyware Terminator itself is spyware/adware. Did you determine Spyware Terminator to be spyware/adware/etc.? No Claim #9) All of our software is using Trojans. Did you find any trojans in our software? No I wish to first solve these claims about our software, and we will go from there. Again, if you do not agree with the answer directly from the company then I insist that you provide proof of why you disagree in the form of screenshots, videos, logs, press releases, documented articles, etc. This is very simple, everything is laid out nice and clear and should make it easy for you to respond.

But there reasons are not reasons to identify Spyware Terminator as "crap" or reasons to list it on the Craptheque page. Spyware Terminator is not as good as other programs - this is your opinion, which may or may not agree with the opinions of other people. This is not a reason to list it at the Craptheque page. Crawler Toolbar is crap - again this is your opinion. We have several hundred thousand users of Crawler Toolbar who will say it is useful. This is not a reason to list it at the Craptheque page. If the doubt is reasonble and can be backed up without false claims, then it is a reason to list it on the Craptheque page. Instead the doubt is raised by claiming Spyware Terminator has a trojan, Crawler Toolbar has a trojan, Crawler Toolbar is installed by drive-by activex, etc.. There is no proof of the claims on the Craptheque page. No screenshots, no video, no text from our policies, no comparisons, no published documents, etc. We are not saying there are or are not better cleaners than Spyware Terminator. We let the user decide. We are simply saying that Spyware Terminator is not bad, Crawler is not bad, and Crawler Toolbar is not bad - because suggesting this will immediately deter users from even trying our software.

I was actually going to write a very long response to every reply since my last, but this has everything I want to say. I am definitely guilty of not knowing the difference between the opinions of Search Engines/Toolbars/Spyware/Security of the US and Europe. So my apologies. The only things I want to add to this are: -The Firefox problem originally brought up by Gixona was not a malicious action from Crawler Toolbar. It was a bug that we will attempt to reproduce to fix. -Spyware Terminator makes it more clear than CCleaner that there is bundled software. How? ---When you click Download on the CCleaner homepage you arrive at this page: http://www.ccleaner.com/download/. You then need to click "Other builds" to get to the page Horus linked. It took me a little while to determine this, myself. ---When you click Download on the Spyware Terminator homepage you arrive at this page: http://www.spywareterminator.com/dnl/landing.aspx. The downloads are clearly stated: "Download FREE Spyware Terminator & Web Security Guard" and "...download free Spyware Terminator without its enhancement, Web Security Guard...". No separate pages, just direct links to both versions. ---FlashGet, another software which includes bundled Google Toolbar, does not state anywhere on their download page of the included toolbar: http://www.flashget.com/en/download.htm. -Spyware Terminator is not the only security program which has included toolbar, opt-out. ---McAfee includes their program SiteAdvisor, which is similar to our Web Security Guard (which we bundle). McAfee software is not identified on the Assiste.com.free.fr Craptheque page. ---CyberDefender includes their program searchSAFE toolbar. CyberDefender was listed at Assiste.com.free.fr Craptheque, but has been removed and no information is present. Only the remark: "Relevé par Eric L. Howes. Voir données complètes et origine de cette information dans "The Spyware Warrior List of Rogue/Suspect Anti-Spyware Products & Web Sites - Eric L. Howes" --- which shows that the Craptheque page was influenced by the actions of Eric Howes.

Sorry for the inactivity. I have to deal with internal issues first. Give me a moment to read over everything.

In the end the choice is the user's, that is correct. However you and everyone continues to mention that software should be developed for the beginner in mind. We agree. However, opinions and claims on this forum, other forums, download sites, etc. should have the beginner user in mind as well. Beginners are easily swayed by the biased positions of certain people, positions of companies, and positions of certain websites. While the people of America probably will not be influenced by the discussion here, or Assiste.com.free.fr, or the Craptheque listing at Assiste.com.free.fr, the people of France, and other French speaking people around the world will be swayed by these sites. From our point of view, it is very important to fix these problems so that we do not lose possible installations of our software in the French market. Every market is important to us, including the French one. edit: i just saw your post ipl_001. I will respond in a moment.

Well this is not my fault. It does not appear that people are reading my responses in previous replies. Everyone keeps rehashing the same questions without proper proof. I am not trying to control opinions here. Opinions, negative and positive are welcome. People criticize our removal engine, people criticize our prevention engine. Thats fine. There are also people who approve of our engines. That is fine too. I can not change that, and I will not try to sway you. However, there is a difference between an opinion and a claim. An opinion is: "I do not like XXXXX because it does YYYY or does not find ZZZZ. I do not recommend using it". You are taking what you are looking at, providing proof and making an opinion. A claim is: "I find a problem with XXXX. It is bad." That is a claim. You pass judgement without providing proof. People continue to bring up that Crawler Toolbar is a trojan, or is bad, or is collecting information, or is selling information, or is doing this or doing that...but without proof. What I am trying to do here is get the proof. If you have proof, great. I will take it up with my superiors and see what the deal is. But no one is providing proof. Proof of a trojan would be a screenshot of an antivirus software detecting a trojan in our software. Proof of malicious intent would be a video of our installation process doing something bad, like deleting files, or downloading advertisements. Proof of selling information would be a published document from a verifiable source with proof of these actions. Nobody is providing proof. So I am left to trying to get it.

It is stupid to make 10 posts in reply to all of your comments. So I will attempt to address everyone's comments in one big post. Sacles and others have said "Crawler is a problem": Explain to me how it is a problem? By "problem" you are referring to something which causes harm I am guessing. How do we do "harm"? If you refer to the original content of this thread, the Firefox problem, it was a BUG which no one seems to want to help us fix; they just complain and think we are maliciously harming your computer. Cornflower says that our software uninstalls without consent: I have shown the screenshot in a previous post. The user can only install the toolbar if they choose to. People download our software from our websites if they want to (there are no drive-by active X), and every one of our software titles is only installed with consent. Cornflower says that other software is hidden in the Spyware Terminator installation: I insist you visit the Spyware Terminator download page (http://www.spywareterminator.com/dnl/landing.aspx ). Every downloadable version is CLEARLY marked to include Web Security Guard. "Download FREE Spyware Terminator & Web Security Guard" Cornflower says our software is impossible to uninstall: The problem presented by Gixona was a BUG, nothing more. We provide full uninstallers for ALL of our software. If you can not find them I can help you find them. If our software did not fully uninstall as with Gixona, then if REPORTED ON OUR FORUM we can help the user fix the BUG. Cornflower brought up that people wanted to know more about this business and there is too much information here: I agree there is too much information here. I apologize for my intervention, but people started to claim that our software malware. If I posted about users here on Spyware Terminator forums nothing would get solved since not many people here read our forums. I had to speak to them directly. If moderators or administrators wish to move any post related to Crawler, Crawer Toolbar, or Crawler policies into a new thread, please do. I am all for it. This thread was meant to fix a simple problem with our software. I am willing to continue this argument for however long it takes to get the Assiste.com.free.fr listing removed. That is my intention. I cant stop people from posting negative things about our company on forums like this one. They are your opinions and we can not do anything to opinions. But it is my job to fix pages like Assiste.com.free.fr which is a place for security information which makes baseless claims about our software which are damaging to our company. Sacles says that we should offer Crawler Toolbar as out-in instead of opt-out: Our opinions (your's and Crawler's) differ on how to offer a toolbar. Several other companies follow the same practices and are not criticized for it, and as long as that is the case Crawler feels it is in line with standards of the market. Sacles says comparison to other products does not just justify the actions of another products: True, but the fact that our products are singled out is indication that Assiste.com.free.fr has a personal vendetta, a negative bias, towards our software and not other software titles. It makes his webpage biased in nature and we feel we should not be given preferential treatment. This must be fixed, and I will continue to compare our software to other software titles because those other software titles are widely accepted and not nearly as criticized as our software. cyrilcf keeps saying we do not want to release certain information about our company: I am here. I work for the company. I have answered every question you have asked me. I am not going anywhere anytime soon. So just ask me what you want to know and I will answer to the best of my abilities. If you do not like my answer please ask me to ask my superiors who should be able to supply satisfactory answers. How many other companies are taking this extra step to completely open about stuff like this? horus agressor says crawler toolbar is a trojan and provides the Craptheque page as proof: 1) our software is not a trojan, 2) the claims made by the Craptheque page are "claims". The claims on that page provide no proof. There are no tests, there is no data, there are no screenshots, nothing. horus agressor brings up things like "Spyware Terminator is an imitation of SpyBot", "the HIPS is not good", and several other opinions of Spyware Terminator: I am not at liberty to judge your opinions. They are you opinions, you have the right to free speech. I will not criticize or degrade your opinions. They are yours and your reason for not using our software. That is perfectly fine. However, these opinions are not reasons for putting Spyware Terminator on the Craptheque page. If parts of our program are not good, then they are not good. Every day we are improving and eventually we will be at a point where people see most of our features as good in comparison. It is hard to compare a freeware application developed by people who are doing this as a hobby to commercial applications, like the ones you mentioned, which charge for their applications. The commercial developers have a standard to uphold to maintain subscribers. Spyware Terminator, too, has standards to uphold but if a user uninstalls our software we do not lose future money. On a side note: we have only a limited number of people who work a standard 8 hour business day to do definition updates. They work from 8AM to 5PM Czech time doing updates. We do not have the resources to have people working around the clock putting out updates every minute of the day. As we grow this will change.

Before responding again, please let me respond to the posts. Thank you.

I understand that, however, I posted those the policies of other search engines so that people would not judge Crawler without knowing that other search engines are following the same policies. That is what assiste.com.free.fr has done - they have judged Crawler without knowing the full extent of the search engine market.

My apologies. I can have MacPeter translate my responses if you want. I do not think the development team would be willing to do that for a two reasons: 1) the program is closed source, it is not open source. So it would go against our license. 2) frankly, we would not trust our sources in the hands of Pierre. This is not meant to single him out...we would not trust our sources in the hands of any independently run website. There should be enough tools available on the web (for free) which can accurately analyze the full range of abilities of Crawler Toolbar (packet analyzers, resource hackers, bandwidth meters, CPU meters, etc.). There is no personal information given to our sponsors. No names, no addresses, no age, etc. Everything that we collect is accurately defined in Crawler's Privacy Policy as in line with other major search engines. In short: we don't sell, share or distribute any personal information from our users: From Crawler Privacy Policy: http://www.spywareterminator.com/legal/privacy.aspx From Google Privacy Policy: http://www.google.com/privacy.html From Yahoo! Privacy Policy: http://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/details.html From MSN Privacy Policy: http://mobile.msn.com/device/en-us/privacy.aspx

This is quite the truth . However, I think he wants the protection - I'm sure he has kids he wants to protect .

Our company (Crawler LLC) offers a parental software title: http://www.crawlerparental.com Feel free to try it. Development has been slowed because of our focus on Spyware Terminator 2.0, but we are continuing to develop it. I am not sure if it has a French translation. I can check.

1) A quoi sert la crawler toolbar exactement ? (What is the Crawler toolbar exactly used for?) It is used as a means for us to make money easier. Sure, we could attempt to operate without a toolbar and hope word of mouth helps spread use of Crawler.com search portal, but word and popularity spreads faster with toolbars. We operate similar to Google, Yahoo!, MSN, AOL, Ask.com, Lycos, Excite.com, etc. Our money comes from using our search engine, just like Google's main source of revenue is use of their search engine. The Crawler toolbar has the same intents as Google Toolbar, Yahoo! Toolbar, etc. Research would probably show that people prefer to use a toolbar instead of using the search engine webpage (in other words, Google Toolbar instead of Google.com, Yahoo! Toolbar instead of Yahoo.com, etc.). Being in a market with several other search engines who have their own toolbars, it is only smart to have our own toolbar which searches our search engine so that our search engine is on a level playing field with all the others. However it should be noted that our toolbar searches Crawler AND Google, Yahoo!, MSN and Ask.com. 2) Quelles sont ses fonctions utiles pour l'utilisateur lambda? (What are its helpful functions for a beginner?) The majority of what Crawler Toolbar 4.5 offers is available in Crawler Toolbar 5.0, and has been upgraded. I will point out which items are specifically part of the new Crawler Toolbar 5.0. ---(Crawler Toolbar 5.0 only) The "Quick Search" feature offers a useful, bigger and clearer "find text" tool for finding text on a webpage. It is meant to be a replacement of the Internet Explorer CTRL-F/F3 window. ---(Crawler Toolbar 5.0 only) Our search box changes its size to accomodate longer search strings - users will be able to see more of their search strings without scrolling the text. ---(Crawler Toolbar 5.0 only) Beginners should enjoy our redesigned settings window. Our setting have been made easier to navigate, and are made more clear. We have also made it harder for beginners to mess up Crawler settings by strategically placing settings in different areas of the settings. We knew our settings window from Crawler Toolbar 4.5 was a liability because it was hard to navigate and could sometimes be an annoyance. When comparing our settings window to other toolbars, we find our settings window to be much clearer and easier to navigate. ---Beginners will benefit from our plugin system which allows control of all of our software by Crawler Toolbar. Some beginners do not know how to operate or know the "System Tray". Our plugin system will make sure users never have to deal with the "System Tray". ---The majority of internet users have a clear idea where they want to go for services such as a Dictionary, Thesaurus, Maps, etc. We have provided links to major services of these types to cater to beginner users who would otherwise not know where to go. Yes, advanced users might find use out of these links, but I believe these were designed with the beginner in mind. Also be aware that these links are not for services we develop in-house, like some "bad" toolbars would use. The links are to well known, trusted services in each category (see below): "People search" leads to http://www.whitepages.com "Travel info" leads to http://www.expedia.com "Shopping" leads to http://www.half.com "Dictionary" leads to http://dictionary.reference.com "Groups" leads to http://groups.google.com etc. ---We provide users the choice of search engine. Some users come onto the internet after watching their favorite television channel and maybe hear the term "Google" or "Yahoo!". Instead of forcing users to use Crawler.com search engine, we allow users to search Google, Yahoo!, MSN or Ask.com. I will ask the developers to maybe add a few more search engines (AOL, Lycos, Excite, Altavista, etc.). Changing search engines in Crawler Toolbar is very easy, and even beginners should have no issue finding it. If I was giving Crawler Toolbar to my mom, she probably would not be able to find it, but she would not know the difference between search engines, anyway. This is a feature for all users who know the difference and was developed with the beginner in mind. (Compare this to the Internet Explorer 7 search bar, which requires you have a bit of knowledge to add more search engines). ....Crawler Toolbar obviously has a lot more features, but I would not recommend them to a beginner just starting with toolbars as they require some technical knowledge. 3) Quelles sont ses actions exactes pour la société éditrice? (What are its exact actions for the editor?) I am sorry, but I do not understand the question. Could you please rephrase? You may write your question in French. MacPeter and ipl_001 can help with the translation.

The "commercial goals" of Crawler is of course to make money and be a profitable company. There are many expenses which Crawler pays (which I am aware of): -Employee salaries -Employee expenses (travel, etc.) -Subscription to malware-providing services (to receive malware samples to add to our database. e.g. www.spywaresignatures.com) -Subscription to download sites for listing our software or to expidite update process (download.com, tucows.com, etc.) Those are the things I am aware of. Crawler does what it feels is necessary to improve the quality of our software and our company name. I know for a fact that our expenses do not go into "dark", "malicious" deals which Assiste.com.free.fr presumes. All of our business deals comply with certain standards, and are 100% legal and legitimate. All of our money comes from business deals with legitimate companies (Google, Yahoo, AOL, etc.), sponsored results when you search on Crawler.com (similar to Google sponsored results), and general searching with Crawler.com or installation of our toolbar. I'm sure there is more complexity to how the money is made, but there are no "bad" deals here. No "malicious software", no trojans, no deals with "dark companies"...nothing of that nature. There is no need to change our business practices because our practices are legitimate and standard for companies with search engine based revenue models, like Google, Yahoo!, MSN, AOL, Ask.com, etc.

I will wait for MacPeter to provide a more clear translation of your questions. I do not fully understand those questions. I think they are the ones from the Assiste.com.free.fr craptheque page if i am not mistaken. You are not giving me the chance to answer the questions. You just say that "I have not answered any questions - end of story". The choice to install is OPTIONAL. If you choose not to install it, then it will not be installed. This is a screenshot of the installation from our most recent 2.0 beta: Uncheck = no install. Check = install. Very simple. "Commercial goals of our society" - are you referring to Crawler? Or the capitalistic US?

Please do not attack me or the company. You keep mentioning that there are questions I have not answered. As I have stated above, whatever questions I have not answered, please ask again. I will be happy to answer them. In most cases it is due to Google Translate not translating properly for me to understand the question. If you dont mind asking in English, I would appreciate it.